An open foreign trade policy and an open external sector havecreated more problems for domestic economy than it has solve

This statement is a matter of debate and depends on various factors and perspectives.

GET PDF of fully solved assignment MCO-15 or any other by click above. You can order any subject ignou solved assignments pdf, ignou handwritten assignments pdf or ignou Handwritten Assignments hard copy from above link.

However, there are arguments for and against this statement.

Arguments in favor of the statement:

  1. Domestic producers may face increased competition from foreign firms, which can lead to job losses and a decline in domestic industries.
  2. An open foreign trade policy can increase the demand for foreign currency, leading to a depreciation of the domestic currency and making imports more expensive.
  3. An open external sector can make the economy more vulnerable to external shocks, such as changes in global commodity prices or geopolitical risks.

Arguments against the statement:

  1. An open foreign trade policy can lead to increased exports, which can provide a boost to the domestic economy and create jobs.
  2. Increased competition from foreign firms can lead to improvements in domestic industries, as firms are forced to become more efficient and innovative to compete.
  3. An open external sector can lead to increased foreign investment, which can help to spur economic growth and development.
  4. An open foreign trade policy can increase the availability of goods and services, providing consumers with a wider range of choices and potentially lowering prices.

Overall, the impact of an open foreign trade policy and an open external sector on the domestic economy can be both positive and negative, depending on the circumstances. Policymakers need to carefully consider the potential benefits and drawbacks of such policies and implement measures to mitigate any negative impacts on the domestic economy.

Leave a Comment